Yes, I'm happy to see that the image policy is finally going forward.
The examples I linked were just the first I found when quickly looking around, I just wanted to point out that the issues are not theoretical already.
And I think the depiction of sexual assault guidelines might need to be clearer whether only what is seen in the image itself and how graphic it is counts or what the image depicts in context. Because the phrasing right now is "Images that depict rape or other forms of sexual assault", but in the case of for example story illustrations, do you decide based on what the image says in the context and with knowledge of the story, or what the image says when you look at it and don't know anything? You say the collars and bondage pictures of the slavefic would be just explicit. So I assume what the picture seems like is the most important?
Like in a hypothetical example to clarify the draft policy for me, if there was a fanwork article about a story in which say Reboot!Kirk likes rough consensual gangbang sex in alleys after being beaten up in a bar brawl. This consensual PWP got a fanart illustration showing Kirk in an alley behind a bar with a bloody face and some recent injuries, with one guy holding him down and two others having sex with him. The picture itself looks pretty much like a sexual assault scenario to anyone who just glances at the picture, even though what it shows is a consensual activity. So does this image get a sexual assault warning or merely an "explicit" warning template?
no subject
The examples I linked were just the first I found when quickly looking around, I just wanted to point out that the issues are not theoretical already.
And I think the depiction of sexual assault guidelines might need to be clearer whether only what is seen in the image itself and how graphic it is counts or what the image depicts in context. Because the phrasing right now is "Images that depict rape or other forms of sexual assault", but in the case of for example story illustrations, do you decide based on what the image says in the context and with knowledge of the story, or what the image says when you look at it and don't know anything? You say the collars and bondage pictures of the slavefic would be just explicit. So I assume what the picture seems like is the most important?
Like in a hypothetical example to clarify the draft policy for me, if there was a fanwork article about a story in which say Reboot!Kirk likes rough consensual gangbang sex in alleys after being beaten up in a bar brawl. This consensual PWP got a fanart illustration showing Kirk in an alley behind a bar with a bloody face and some recent injuries, with one guy holding him down and two others having sex with him. The picture itself looks pretty much like a sexual assault scenario to anyone who just glances at the picture, even though what it shows is a consensual activity. So does this image get a sexual assault warning or merely an "explicit" warning template?