"Fandoms by Source Text" includes all fandoms that are focused on a single "text" or set of texts...
I get that this is a description of the way that things are now, but it seems odd that you're proposing keeping the same term when you're proposing to put non text-based fandoms like RPF under that heading.
Or are you? I can't quite parse this here:
No fandom that has a fandom category needs to have a page categorized under Fandoms by Source Text.
As I consider myself fairly fandom-savvy and Wiki-savvy, I think that my confusion doesn't bode well for your plan....
ETA: Are books part of Media Fandom or not? Again, confusion...
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
I get that this is a description of the way that things are now, but it seems odd that you're proposing keeping the same term when you're proposing to put non text-based fandoms like RPF under that heading.
Or are you? I can't quite parse this here:
No fandom that has a fandom category needs to have a page categorized under Fandoms by Source Text.
As I consider myself fairly fandom-savvy and Wiki-savvy, I think that my confusion doesn't bode well for your plan....
ETA: Are books part of Media Fandom or not? Again, confusion...