The Harry Potter category could be cross-linked as needed: it could be a subcategory of Media Fandom and of Anime & Manga, or whatever. Or maybe the solution is to leave HP as a stand-alone fandom category.
>As well, how would same-Source Community and multiple-Source Community variant canons be categorized (on the chart, moving right to left)?
It depends on whether they are separate fandoms or not. The point of "Fandoms by Source Community" is to ignore the media format of the canon text and just identify how fans group themselves.
>I find Source Community;Media Fandom confusing, but assume that this is already something that has been hashed out. I was surprised that it seems to contain all English-language film, television, books, music, theater, animation, and radio, but assume those would be subcategories?
There would be no media format subcategories. Every fandom that is considered to be a "media fandom" would be a subcategory under Media Fandom. If there is some question about whether certain fandoms fit there or not, editors can discuss it on the talk page.
no subject
>As well, how would same-Source Community and multiple-Source Community variant canons be categorized (on the chart, moving right to left)?
It depends on whether they are separate fandoms or not. The point of "Fandoms by Source Community" is to ignore the media format of the canon text and just identify how fans group themselves.
>I find Source Community;Media Fandom confusing, but assume that this is already something that has been hashed out. I was surprised that it seems to contain all English-language film, television, books, music, theater, animation, and radio, but assume those would be subcategories?
There would be no media format subcategories. Every fandom that is considered to be a "media fandom" would be a subcategory under Media Fandom. If there is some question about whether certain fandoms fit there or not, editors can discuss it on the talk page.