Someone wrote in [community profile] fanlore 2012-09-23 01:17 am (UTC)

I think the idea is that though a fic and podfic are connected, they are still different fanworks. So if a fan believes that a podfic warrants its own page, I want to preserve that fan's right to make a page about that fanwork and not have it be altered to be about the fic, which is a different (though related) fanwork. (Fanlore has a policy about "letting fans define themselves," but I can't find the specific quote ATM).

I do agree with you that in many cases it makes sense for information about a fic and the podfic(s) based on it to appear in the same article, especially if there's not a whole lot to say about one or the other. In cases where there is not enough info for a whole page about the fic, it'd be reasonable to add a short "This podfic was based on the story by [so-and-so] which [minimal information]" on a podfic page the same way it's reasonable to say "This story was made into a podfic by [so-and-so] which [minimal information]" on a page about the story. But the idea is that they're separate fanworks and should be treated at such, even though one is based on the other. (FWIW, I feel the same way about fanart/fic trailers/whatever based on fic.)

Hope that makes sense!

--sparc

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org