paraka: A baby wearing headphones and holding a mic (Default)
paraka ([personal profile] paraka) wrote in [community profile] fanlore2012-09-21 03:24 pm

Podfic Entries

I've been trying to add more entries to Fanlore about podfic and have run into a bit of an issue. When I was creating new pages I was titling them "Title (podfic)" to help distinguish that this was an entry about the podfic not about the fic, which normally has the same title.

The problem though, is that this goes against current Fanlore policies to only add an honourific to an entry if there's a conflicting entry of the same name and there's a need to disambiguate. So the gardeners, rightly, were changing the names of the pages I created to remove the honourific.

And while I totally understand the reason for the policy, it still made me nervous because without the (podfic) in the title it just wasn't as clear that the entry was a podfic entry. Sure enough, one of the entries I made was later edited in a way to make it seem more like a fic entry (it's since been changed back and with other additions).

So I'd like to have a conversation about what we can do to make sure that podfic entries are welcomed on Fanlore and that future editors, trying to be helpful but not aware that the entry is a podfic entry, won't end up morphing the entries into fic entries. I've spoken to some individual podficcers about this as well as some of the Fanlore gardeners, and here's some of the suggestions we've come up with so far:

[personal profile] klb suggested that one way to deal with it is to include "podfic" in the title, but not as an honourific. So "Title podfic" would be how the pages are named. Most of the time, in fannish day-to-day conversations, people will often specify when they're talking about a podfic if the context of the situation doesn't already imply it. And when you look at places like AO3 or general fandom comms, many podficcers add that sort of distinction when they post their work. So adding "podfic" to the title does reflect podfic fandom today.

Sparcicle suggested that we add a note to the top of podfic pages saying "This page is about the podfic. For the story, see Title (story)."
This will give an immediate visual clue to those viewing the page that this is a page for the podfic and gives them a link to the fic page (or the opportunity to create a page for the fic if it doesn't already exist, as it won't in most cases).

There was some debate in the talk page where this was brought up that (story) is perhaps not the correct honourific and, while I'm throwing my 2 cents in, I'd like to say that I'd prefer to see the fic getting an honourific like (fanfic) instead, since the podfic is a story too (as are vids and comics and many other fanarts). In fact, what the fic and podfic share is the story, what we need to disambiguate is which medium the story is being told in.

[personal profile] aethel suggested adding a grey banner to the infobox to make it clearer that the template is a podfic template.

Personally, I think I like options 2 and 3 together best, but I thought I'd ask others how they feel before I start creating a bunch more pages. And please feel free to add more suggestions!
klb: (Default)

[personal profile] klb 2012-09-22 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Frankly, that seems like overkill to me. What's the worse that could happen? Some other editor feels inspired to add more information! That's a good thing. So what if it's about the fic? It's still new information that wasn't there before. Success!

I don't disagree with any of your conclusions about fic and podfic being on the same page as long as the entries aren't both long, or about using aethel's suggestion (and I don't see why they can't both happen. It can be marked as a podfic page but still include some info about the fic that the podfic is a reading of, since that is information closely connected to the podfic), but I do want to clarify that the problem here wasn't that someone *added* info about the fic to the page. The only change they made was from

'''This Never Happened ''' is a Frank Iero/Gerard Way [[podfic]] by klb (3:05:31).

to

'''This Never Happened ''' is a Frank Iero/Gerard Way fanfic originally written by bexless, of which klb made a [[podfic]] (3:05:31).

and from

This was created for [[podficbigbang]]

to

The podfic was created for [[podficbigbang]]

Note that the info that it was written by bexless had already been present on the podfic page, along with a link to the text of the fic, so the addition of the author's name to that first sentence was not new information.

The only reason I'm clarifying that point is because I don't want there to be an implication that it would have inherently been a problem to add information about the fic onto the page about the podfic. Especially if it was added in a subsection further down the page, I doubt anybody would have had much of a problem with this. I feel like this situation has been read in a lot of places as podficcers not wanting any information about the fic on a fanlore page about podfic, and I don't think that's the source of the reaction to the edit at all!
Edited 2012-09-22 16:49 (UTC)
ext_3626: (Default)

[identity profile] frogspace.livejournal.com 2012-09-22 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
so the addition of the author's name to that first sentence was not new information.

And I replied to paraka on the talk page "then change it back". I also said in my comment above: "Maybe it's wrong and needs to be removed."
klb: (Default)

[personal profile] klb 2012-09-22 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
*nod* Right, and it has been changed back. And again, I don't disagree with anything you said? I just think there has been a lot of third-hand hearing about what happened and interpreting it as that there was a problem with fic information being included in a podfic post, and that's not, I think, the actual source for the concern. The source for the concern was that having a post about the podfic (without being clearly marked as such in a way that aethel's banner would do or in a way that having separate podfic and fic subsections on the page would) was viewed as a mistake that needed to be corrected by at least one reader. That indicates that there were probably a lot of other readers with that same sense of dissonance at reading the page in the way that it was. Without (podfic) in the title or a clarification that it was a podfic entry or a podfic subsection in an entry, it looked like the entry was somehow claiming that the podfic version of the fanwork was the only version, or the only version worth writing about, which looks to viewers like a mistake/oversight/stand that no one was actually taking. When there's more clarity that this is specifically an entry for the podfic version of a fanwork which is closely connected to the fic version of the fanwork (of the same name), then that view of the podfic focus of the page content as a mistake or oversight will be alleviated.
Edited 2012-09-22 17:17 (UTC)
morgandawn: (Default)

[personal profile] morgandawn 2012-09-22 05:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for making that point (that podficcers are not trying to 'ignore" the fic's existence. In fact adding textual "clarifying" text is part of what we (or rather I) normally do when there may be overlap or confusion on any number of points. Some readers read the infobox. others, like me, read text/words and some are more visual (colors/links). Having the info in multiple places is not a bad thing.
klb: (Default)

[personal profile] klb 2012-09-22 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Y, and there's nothing wrong with adding the author's name in multiple places, of course! If it had been edited to

'''This Never Happened ''' is a Frank Iero/Gerard Way [podfic]] (3:05:31) of a fanfic written by bexless

that again would not have sparked the slightest bit of concern on my part, or, I'm guessing, the part of most of the people who were worried about the implications of the edit that was actually made. I would have seen it as helpful and great, because more visibility for that awesome fic and that awesome author are excellent things. (In fact, helping introduce new people to fics I love is a part of why I make podfic.)
anatsuno: (bandaid for your mood?)

[personal profile] anatsuno 2012-09-22 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
indeed, the whole issue - well for me, anyway - is that we know there's an endemic risk for podfic to be perceived as thing that's so secondary a "correction" like that one is necessary/right. More information, and information about the fic, is really not a problem. Transforming an entry about a podfic into an entry about a fic = a problem.