![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I'm working on the article on Fandom and the Internet, and I could really use some more perspectives. Previously, this article was a rehash of a lot of the Zines and the Internet content. This leads to, IMO, way too much focus on the differences between "print fans" and "net fans" and a tight focus on fanfic.
Here's the kind of reaction I'm thinking of. This one's from a post about the Crossing the Line panel at Escapade in 1998 that's quoted various places on Fanlore: "...I'm not thinking in terms of mail-order purchase, but in terms of opening a dialogue with someone else. *That* is something I don't get by hitting somebody's web page to see if anything new has been posted, no matter how much I may like her stories."
And, yes, yes, Fanlore is more about fanworks-producing fandom than about happen-to-like-stuff ways of being a fan, but I don't think you can divorce early online fic writing from early internet culture or from non-fic fan activities--just like you can't divorce anime fanworks in English from the fansubbing and pirating that let fans access the canon early on or media fandom zines from SF fandom convention culture that spawned media fandom in the first place.
Quotes like that one make me think a lot of people are probably unaware of how influential MUDs were (either as social spaces or as places for roleplaying) or that meaty canon discussion was often on Usenet (not the web or even mailing lists) or that anime fandom used to be heavily dependant on IRC. (As I've ranted in my own journal, of course the web didn't provide that in 1998. The web SUCKED for most of the 90's.)
My idea is that the article should give a good starting point for understanding what different types of infrastructure existed at different points and where/when major fandom migrations happened.
The timeline seen in the article is located here. (It's slightly trickier to edit than a regular page, but there are help files if you poke around.)
Thoughts, anyone?
Here's the kind of reaction I'm thinking of. This one's from a post about the Crossing the Line panel at Escapade in 1998 that's quoted various places on Fanlore: "...I'm not thinking in terms of mail-order purchase, but in terms of opening a dialogue with someone else. *That* is something I don't get by hitting somebody's web page to see if anything new has been posted, no matter how much I may like her stories."
And, yes, yes, Fanlore is more about fanworks-producing fandom than about happen-to-like-stuff ways of being a fan, but I don't think you can divorce early online fic writing from early internet culture or from non-fic fan activities--just like you can't divorce anime fanworks in English from the fansubbing and pirating that let fans access the canon early on or media fandom zines from SF fandom convention culture that spawned media fandom in the first place.
Quotes like that one make me think a lot of people are probably unaware of how influential MUDs were (either as social spaces or as places for roleplaying) or that meaty canon discussion was often on Usenet (not the web or even mailing lists) or that anime fandom used to be heavily dependant on IRC. (As I've ranted in my own journal, of course the web didn't provide that in 1998. The web SUCKED for most of the 90's.)
My idea is that the article should give a good starting point for understanding what different types of infrastructure existed at different points and where/when major fandom migrations happened.
The timeline seen in the article is located here. (It's slightly trickier to edit than a regular page, but there are help files if you poke around.)
Thoughts, anyone?
no subject