April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 04:01 pm
Systems has implemented ReCaptcha on Fanlore to prevent spambots from signing up with new accounts. ReCaptcha is an image captcha that is supposed to be more effective against spam than our old math captcha.

Anyone who already has a Fanlore account should never see ReCaptcha. Let us know if you do encounter ReCaptcha, or if you see anything weird, or if (heaven forbid) you see an uptick in spam activity.
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 03:08 pm (UTC)
ReCapthca is considered fairly accessible--it includes an audio option, for example--but some people will not be able to solve either the visual or the audio test.

Is there a procedure in place now for people wanting accounts who struggle with ReCaptcha tests?

Will there be a useful error message for would-be editors if they fail the test on account creation that leads them to this alternate procedure in an accessible way?
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 05:25 pm (UTC)

Would an automated email to the Gardeners list be an ok alternate procedure? We could set up an account for the new user, and then once they're logged in they can change their password without using a captcha.
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 08:10 pm (UTC)
I don't really know, I guess that would depend on how the user experienced it. It would be important to make sure the user knew right away that there was an alternate method of account creation, and it needs to be accessible to everyone.

The worst case is an uninformative error screen with no indication of what the user should do next.

Best case would be not making users who already know they can't do ReCaptcha most of the time not have to try it first, fail, and then find out what the alternate method is.

And just to make a more general comment here--this is why a successful organization has an accessibility/diversity/usability policy.

This kind of thing should always be built into the thinking stage of design, and a policy helps people remember they're not just designing for themselves as a typical user. Accessibility and usability by design is cheaper and faster and easier than fixing it later.
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 08:20 pm (UTC)

I don't really know, I guess that would depend on how the user experienced it. It would be important to make sure the user knew right away that there was an alternate method of account creation, and it needs to be accessible to everyone.

So, maybe on the captcha page itself, something like, "If this captcha does not work for you, click *here* to send an email to the Gardeners requesting a Fanlore account. Please include your preferred username."

As far as an accessibility policy, you're right-- it should probably be its own page included in the category http://fanlore.org/wiki/Category:Fanlore_Policies ?
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 10:40 pm (UTC)
I think your idea of an email link on the page itself is likely very workable. To be honest, it's so long since I signed up for my account, I can't really remember how it was set up.

I don't know what I think about just a Fanlore accessibility and/or diversity policy. Does the OTW itself have one? Should it be the same cross-project? I don't have the insider knowledge to make an informed opinion on that.

But as a Fanlore-specific example, we put a lot of images up on Fanlore without alt text. A policy that reminds us to think about all users might have led us to require alt text on images out of the box and given us a better site today without it ever having been a big deal for editors who were encountering alt text for the first time.
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 11:33 pm (UTC)
I just edited the recaptcha instructions, so now everyone who goes to create a new account should encounter the message:

http://fanlore.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&type=signup&returnto=Special:UserLogin
Friday, July 27th, 2012 04:56 am (UTC)

Er... that link goes to a page that requires the user to enter a captcha.
Friday, July 27th, 2012 05:02 am (UTC)

Yes, but when you "click here to send an email requesting a Fanlore account," it takes you to ANOTHER page where you have to enter a captcha in order to send a message to the Gardeners.
Friday, July 27th, 2012 08:19 pm (UTC)
Huh, you're right, I didn't notice that. (At least it's an easier one? ^^) I'll ask if there was a specific reason why we didn't publicize the gardener mailing list address.
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 07:40 am (UTC)
I asked and it turned out that we set up the webform this way because the mailing list got a lot of spam before. I can't think of any alternatives immediately and none of us is an accessibility expert, but we'll look for options.
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 11:40 am (UTC)

But the spam was coming through the OTW site, right? So if we just put the email to the gardeners list in plaintext on the Fanlore account creation page (instead of a link to the form on the OTW site) that wouldn't be a problem.
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 11:43 am (UTC)

Alternately, we could try putting the email address on there, but hiding it from spammers by using Javascript?

http://womeninbusiness.about.com/od/internetmarketingseo/a/tips-obfu-java.htm

http://javascript.about.com/library/blemail1.htm
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 02:39 am (UTC)
Can I get you to clarify something for me? You are a Gardener, not a member of the Fanlore committee or an admin or a staffer or someone involved in Systems? Is that correct?
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 11:33 am (UTC)

Me? Yes, that's right, I've been a Gardener since Dec 2010.
Sunday, July 29th, 2012 09:35 pm (UTC)
Thanks, I was just getting confused by who was committee and/or staffer and who was speaking (or not speaking) to whom.
Monday, July 30th, 2012 03:08 am (UTC)
Systems is reading, though. ;)

->Arrow
Friday, July 27th, 2012 06:38 am (UTC)
Hugely in favour though I am of getting these spambots out of our hair, I've just looked at two of these ReCaptchas (using the link [personal profile] liviapenn posted above) & could solve neither of them. I don't usually have a problem very often with image captchas -- are these set to be particularly tricky?
Friday, July 27th, 2012 08:13 pm (UTC)
Not as far as I know. We didn't have much choice between different kinds of image captchas because we wanted one that also offered an audio version. (Why we didn't use the same one as on this site - neither we nor Systems thought of it? And we're not going to change it immediately if we can help it, testing was a pain.) We're aware that this one is tricky, but every new user only has to solve it once, and we thought less spambots was worth the minor hassle.
Friday, July 27th, 2012 11:12 pm (UTC)
I've tried about twenty refreshes now. Several didn't seem to be displayed properly (one of the words was just two part lines) and there's only been two or three I was fairly sure I could do. I am rather worried that this will completely stop genuine fen from signing up.

The OTW contact form seems much clearer.
Friday, July 27th, 2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
What browser are you using?
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 12:24 am (UTC)
Firefox 14.0.1.
Saturday, July 28th, 2012 07:49 am (UTC)
None of us who were testing used this browser version, so we might have overlooked something. We'll take a look and then contact Systems. Thanks for telling us!
Sunday, July 29th, 2012 03:09 am (UTC)
I'm on a PC. The audio version is completely impossible, but I have difficulty hearing words over noise, so I'd always prefer the visual.
Monday, July 30th, 2012 07:21 am (UTC)
As I wrote to someone upthread, the captcha used by OTW comment form was a lot more usable -- I tried the audio for that one also, and it was very clear.
Monday, July 30th, 2012 05:44 pm (UTC)
Well, it's another image/audio captcha rather than the simple sum, so I'd imagine it would be more difficult for bots. But I bow to the technical people...